Femoroacetabular Impingement
Lower LimbOverview
Femoroacetabular impingement is a condition characterized by abnormal contact between the femoral head-neck junction or acetabular rim and the acetabular cartilage, leading to pain and potential labral pathology. It represents a primary cause of hip osteoarthritis and is commonly seen in active individuals. Early identification and management are crucial to prevent progression to degenerative joint disease.
Pathophysiology
FAI occurs due to anatomical abnormalities in hip morphology, primarily involving either a cam deformity (excessive bone at the femoral head-neck junction causing abnormal impingement during flexion and internal rotation) or a pincer deformity (over-coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum). These morphological variants cause increased joint stress, repetitive micro-trauma to the labrum and chondral surfaces, and inflammatory changes. Over time, this leads to labral tears, cartilage damage, and progression toward osteoarthritis if left unmanaged.
Patient Education
Hip FAI often improves with activity modification, strengthening of hip stabilizers, and maintaining hip mobility to reduce compensatory stress on the joint.
Typical Presentation
Site
Anterior groin pain, anterior thigh pain, lateral hip; may refer to buttock or knee
Quality
Sharp, catching, clicking, or pinching sensation in the groin; described as tightness or stiffness
Intensity
Mild to moderate (3-7/10) that worsens with activity; often activity-dependent
Aggravating
Prolonged sitting, hip flexion with internal rotation, squatting, stairs, running, pivoting movements, certain sports positions
Relieving
Rest, hip extension, external rotation, avoiding provocative positions, anti-inflammatory medication
Associated
Hip stiffness, reduced internal rotation (particularly pathognomonic), click or clunk with hip flexion, limping gait, buttock or lateral hip pain, functional limitations in athletics
Orthopaedic Tests
Test descriptions are written with AI assistance from standard clinical texts. Where a test lists Sources, its description has been checked against them; those sources are independent and do not endorse OsteoKit. Accuracy figures and grades (A–D) appear only when checked against the published study; tests without one are marked “No accuracy study”.
Further reading: full test procedures are described in standard clinical examination texts, e.g. Magee & Manske, Orthopedic Physical Assessment (7th ed.), and Cook & Hegedus, Orthopedic Physical Examination Tests: An Evidence-Based Approach (2nd ed.).
Scour Test (Quadrant Test)
Procedure
Patient supine with hip flexed and slightly abducted. Examiner applies gentle axial loading to femur while internally and externally rotating the hip through range. Positive if pain localizes to groin.
Positive Finding
Anterior hip, groin, or medial hip pain with axial loading and rotation, particularly during internal rotation phase
Sensitivity / Specificity
Reference: Maslowski E, Sullivan W, Forster Harwood J, Gonzalez P, Kaufman M, Vidal A, Akuthota V. The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology. PM R 2010;2(3):174-81; PMID 20359681
Interpretation
Pain on scouring suggests an intra-articular source, but the test is weak both ways — 50-62% sensitive, 29-38% specific — so a negative does not exclude and most positives are false alarms. Use it alongside FADIR, FABER, internal rotation range and imaging. Scour with adduction is also one of the five Sutlive hip osteoarthritis predictors, valuable only in combination with the other four.
FABER Test (Flexion-Abduction-External Rotation)
Procedure
Patient supine; examiner flexes, abducts, and externally rotates the hip, then applies gentle overpressure.
Positive Finding
Anterior groin or hip pain at end-range of flexion, abduction, and external rotation
Interpretation
Sensitive but not specific: a positive FABER means the hip joint is a plausible source, not that femoroacetabular impingement is the cause — it cannot separate impingement from labral pathology, capsular irritation or early osteoarthritis. Groin or anterior hip pain is the meaningful response; lateral pain suggests an extra-articular source. Combine with the anterior impingement test, restricted internal rotation in flexion, and imaging. In one study of 50 people referred for a hip joint injection (Maslowski 2010), FABER was positive in 82% of those whose pain came from inside the joint (at least 80% relief after the injection). No test in that study correctly cleared more than about a third of the people whose pain was not from the joint, so a positive FABER cannot confirm the joint as the source, let alone which structure is at fault. The study looked at pain from inside the hip joint in general, not this condition specifically, so no figure is shown.
Sources
- Educational sitePhysiopedia. FABER Test.
- Reference bookRaj MA, Ampat G, Varacallo MA. Sacroiliac Joint Pain. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; updated 14 Aug 2023.
- RelatedMaslowski E, Sullivan W, Forster Harwood J, Gonzalez P, Kaufman M, Vidal A, et al. The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology. PM R. 2010;2(3):174-81.
Anterior Hip Apprehension Test
Procedure
Patient supine with hip and knee flexed to 90°. Examiner applies passive external rotation and abduction. Positive if patient reports apprehension of instability or pain.
Positive Finding
Apprehension or sense of instability in anterior hip region; may be accompanied by pain
Interpretation
Apprehension or a sense of instability in extension with external rotation raises the possibility of anterior hip microinstability or capsular laxity, which can coexist with femoroacetabular impingement and can change management. No validated diagnostic-accuracy figures support this test, so treat a positive result as a prompt to assess for generalised laxity and consider imaging, not as evidence of instability.
Log Roll Test (Hip Internal-External Rotation in Supine)
Procedure
Patient supine with hip and knee slightly flexed (~20°). Examiner gently internally and externally rotates hip through available range. Positive if groin pain occurs.
Positive Finding
Anterior hip or groin pain with passive internal rotation, or apprehension with external rotation
Interpretation
The log roll moves the femoral head within the acetabulum with the surrounding musculature relaxed, so a painful or restricted result points to the joint and capsule rather than to muscle or tendon. That relative specificity for an intra-articular source is its only real strength. It is NOT a screening test — sensitivity is low, so a normal log roll does not exclude femoroacetabular impingement. Use FADIR to screen.
FADIR Test (Flexion-Adduction-Internal Rotation)
Procedure
Patient supine; hip flexed to 90°, adducted, and internally rotated. Apply gentle overpressure. Positive if anterior hip or groin pain occurs.
Positive Finding
Anterior hip or groin pain with passive hip flexion, adduction, and internal rotation
Sensitivity / Specificity
Reference: Reiman MP, Goode AP, Cook CE, Hölmich P, Thorborg K. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015;49(12):811; PMID 25515771
Interpretation
The best available screening test for intra-articular hip pathology, and a poor confirmatory one. Pooled sensitivity 0.94-0.99, so a negative FADIR makes femoroacetabular impingement or labral pathology unlikely — that is the informative result. A positive is weak on its own: specificity is low, and the test is frequently positive in asymptomatic hips, osteoarthritis and labral tears. Pair with FABER, restricted internal rotation in flexion, and imaging.
⚠ Red Flags
- •Acute severe hip pain with fever suggesting septic arthritis
- •Progressive neurological deficits in lower limb
- •Severe unilateral hip pain with night symptoms and systemic symptoms (malignancy concern)
- •Inability to bear weight acutely
- •Signs of avascular necrosis (collapse, severe restriction, night pain)
- •Recent trauma with severe pain and immobility
⚡ Yellow Flags
- •Fear-avoidance beliefs regarding hip movement and activity
- •Excessive focus on imaging findings creating catastrophizing
- •Significant psychological distress or depression affecting rehabilitation adherence
- •High-level athlete with unrealistic return-to-sport timelines
- •Pending litigation or workers' compensation claims
- •Poor coping strategies or passive approach to treatment
Osteopathic Techniques
First-line care is education and exercise-based physiotherapy. About half of people with non-arthritic hip pain respond to nonoperative care, but which parts of it help is unclear.
- Journal articleDancy et al. · JBJS Rev 2025
- Journal articleProbst et al. · J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023
Region
Hip joint
Technique
Rationale
Gentle, rhythmic movement of the hip joint within its comfortable range. In one small pilot it added nothing to exercise.
How it's done, cautions & evidence
How it's done
Rhythmic, low-velocity passive movement of the hip joint within its range, with no thrust, usually with the patient supine. In hip osteoarthritis trials it was given as a course of about 9–10 sessions over 5–12 weeks.
Cautions
Side effects are usually mild and short-lived. In one hip osteoarthritis trial, 41% of the active group (manual therapy plus exercise) reported mild side effects, against 14% with sham.
Evidence in Femoroacetabular Impingement
Searched 24 Oct 2026: no trials of hip mobilisation alone in FAI. Wright 2016 (pilot RCT, n=15): manual therapy plus supervised exercise was no better than advice and a home programme at 7 weeks; both groups improved. Probst 2023 (non-arthritic hip pain): no clear effect of the type of physiotherapy, including mobilisation (very low to low certainty).
Sources
- Journal articleCoulter et al. · Spine J 2018
- Journal articleHoeksma et al. · Arthritis Rheum 2004
- Journal articleBennell et al. · JAMA 2014
- Journal articleWright et al. · J Sci Med Sport 2016
- Journal articleProbst et al. · J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023
Region
Hip flexors and adductors
Technique
Rationale
Eases tension in the hip and thigh muscles. Not tested in trials for this condition.
How it's done & evidence
How it's done
Hands-on kneading, stretching and sustained pressure to the muscles around the hip and thigh: the hip flexors, adductors and hamstrings, and tensor fasciae latae with the iliotibial band.
Evidence in Femoroacetabular Impingement
Searched 24 Oct 2026: no trials of hip soft tissue technique in FAI.
Sources
- Journal articleFurlan et al. · Cochrane 2015
Region
Piriformis and deep hip rotators
Technique
Rationale
Low-force MET or counterstrain for tight deep hip rotators. Not tested in trials for this condition.
How it's done, cautions & evidence
How it's done
MET: supine, the affected foot rests beside the opposite knee and the knee is taken across to the barrier; the patient pushes back gently against resistance, relaxes, and the stretch is taken up. Counterstrain: prone, the leg is hung off the table with the hip flexed, abducted and externally rotated until the tender point eases, held 90 seconds.
Cautions
Do not use with a fracture, torn ligament or tendon, joint instability, recent surgery, active infection or open wounds. Not for neuropathic pain or pain caused by infection.
Evidence in Femoroacetabular Impingement
Searched 24 Oct 2026: no trials of deep hip rotator MET in FAI.
Sources
- Reference bookMalhotra & Bordoni · StatPearls 2023
Rehabilitation Exercises
Hip external rotation mobilization (supine)
Hip flexor stretch (half-kneeling or standing)
Piriformis stretch (supine figure-4)
Gluteus medius activation (side-lying abduction)
Clamshells (side-lying external rotation)
Bridging with gluteal emphasis
Single-leg Romanian deadlift (RDL)
Single-leg stance on unstable surface
Quadruped hip rotation (threadthe-needle)
Monster walks with resistance band
Copenhagen adductor squeeze (side-lying)
Swimming or hydrotherapy (non-weight bearing cardio)
Referral Criteria
- •Imaging evidence of severe labral pathology with mechanical symptoms unresponsive to conservative care for 3+ months
- •Suspected osteoarthritis progression with imaging confirmation and functional decline
- •Failure to improve after 6-8 weeks of structured conservative treatment
- •Mechanical locking or catching limiting function despite conservative management
- •High-level athletes requiring return-to-sport and considering surgical options
- •Severe pain limiting activities of daily living despite optimal conservative management
- •Suspected avascular necrosis or other hip pathology requiring specialist imaging interpretation
- •Signs of intra-articular loose body or syndromic presentation
- •Patient anxiety or psychological factors significantly impacting rehabilitation adherence warranting pain psychology referral