Non-Specific Low Back Pain
SpineOverview
Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is low back pain without a clearly identifiable structural pathology or nerve root compromise, accounting for approximately 85-90% of all low back pain presentations. It is characterized by pain in the lumbar region that may or may not radiate, with multifactorial causation including muscular, ligamentous, postural, and psychosocial factors. Management focuses on maintaining activity, addressing mechanical dysfunction, and optimizing biopsychosocial factors to prevent chronicity.
Pathophysiology
Non-specific low back pain typically results from a combination of mechanical dysfunction, muscular imbalance, and altered neuromuscular control rather than a single discrete lesion. Common mechanisms include lumbar facet joint irritation, ligamentous strain, muscular fatigue or spasm, discogenic pain without nerve involvement, sacroiliac joint dysfunction, and myofascial trigger points. Repetitive microtrauma, cumulative postural strain, and inadequate recovery periods lead to chronic inflammation and maladaptive motor patterns.
Patient Education
Stay active within pain tolerance, maintain good posture and core engagement, and address stress and sleep quality, as these factors are critical to recovery and preventing long-term disability.
Typical Presentation
Site
Lower lumbar region (L4-S1), often bilateral or unilateral; may radiate to buttock or upper thigh without crossing the knee
Quality
Aching, stiffness, muscle tension, sometimes stabbing or sharp with movement; patients may describe 'catching' or 'locking' sensations
Intensity
Highly variable (2-8/10), often worse in morning or after prolonged postures, may fluctuate throughout the day
Aggravating
Prolonged sitting or standing, bending forward, lifting, twisting, poor posture, fatigue, emotional stress, inadequate sleep
Relieving
Positional changes, movement and activity, heat, massage, stretching, rest periods (though complete immobility is counterproductive)
Associated
Morning stiffness, muscle tightness in lower back and hip flexors, reduced spinal mobility, postural dysfunction, movement-related anxiety, sleep disturbance
Orthopaedic Tests
Test descriptions are written with AI assistance from standard clinical texts. Where a test lists Sources, its description has been checked against them; those sources are independent and do not endorse OsteoKit. Accuracy figures and grades (A–D) appear only when checked against the published study; tests without one are marked “No accuracy study”.
Further reading: full test procedures are described in standard clinical examination texts, e.g. Magee & Manske, Orthopedic Physical Assessment (7th ed.), and Cook & Hegedus, Orthopedic Physical Examination Tests: An Evidence-Based Approach (2nd ed.).
Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test
Procedure
Patient supine, both legs straight, no pillow under the head. Lift the symptomatic leg slowly with the knee held straight until the patient reports symptoms or you reach end of range. Note the angle and where the symptoms are felt. Adding ankle dorsiflexion or neck flexion at that point helps tell nerve pain from hamstring stretch.
Positive Finding
The patient's familiar leg pain, usually below the knee, reproduced as the leg is raised and made worse by ankle dorsiflexion or neck flexion. Back pain alone or a posterior thigh stretch does not count.
Interpretation
In non-specific low back pain this test is a screen, not a diagnosis. A negative test fits the picture of back pain without nerve-root involvement. A positive test points away from non-specific low back pain towards radicular pain, and the neurological examination should follow. Here the SLR is used to check for nerve-root involvement, which by definition is absent in non-specific low back pain. Its published accuracy is for disc herniation causing leg pain (see the lumbar disc herniation page), so no figure is shown here.
Lumbar Flexion Range of Motion (Schober Test or Modified-Modified Schober)
Procedure
Patient standing. Mark the midpoint between the two posterior superior iliac spines (the dimples of Venus), then mark 15 cm above it (modified-modified Schober). Ask the patient to bend forward as far as comfortable with knees straight and re-measure the distance between the marks.
Positive Finding
Less increase in the distance than expected, or bending limited by pain or guarding. Record the measurement and what stopped the movement.
Interpretation
A measure of how much the lumbar spine moves, not a diagnostic test. Use it as a baseline and to track change with treatment. Marked, persistent loss of lumbar flexion in a younger adult with inflammatory-type back pain (morning stiffness, better with movement) should prompt assessment for axial spondyloarthritis. This is a range-of-motion measurement, not a test that diagnoses a condition, so sensitivity and specificity do not apply.
Palpation for Segmental Dysfunction or Tenderness
Procedure
Patient prone with a pillow under the abdomen if needed. Palpate the spinous processes, the paraspinal muscles and the interspinous spaces from T12 to the sacrum, then apply gentle posterior-to-anterior pressure at each level. Ask whether any pressure reproduces the familiar pain.
Positive Finding
Tenderness, increased muscle tone or reproduction of the familiar pain at one or more levels, compared with levels above and below.
Interpretation
Helps locate the painful region and guides where to start treatment. Agreement between clinicians on which segment is stiff or tender is poor, so the finding should not be used to name a pain source. Tenderness in non-specific low back pain is common and expected.
Quadrant Test (Extension/Rotation)
Procedure
Patient standing. Guide the trunk into extension, then side-bending and rotation towards the painful side, and add gentle overpressure through the shoulders if tolerated. Repeat to the other side.
Positive Finding
Reproduction of the familiar local back pain on the side of the movement. Leg pain in this position is recorded separately, as it may reflect narrowing of the foramen rather than a joint source.
Interpretation
A movement that loads the posterior joints and structures on one side. A positive result tells you which movement provokes the pain, which is useful for treatment and for tracking progress. It cannot identify the facet joint as the pain source. A 2014 systematic review (Stuber et al.; 5 studies, nerve blocks as the reference) looked at this extension–rotation test (Kemp's test) for facet joint pain. In the 2 studies that used confirmatory double blocks (320 patients), it was positive in 46% of people with facet joint pain and negative in 47% of those without, which is no better than chance. The review was about facet joint pain, not non-specific low back pain, so no figure is shown.
Sources
- Journal articleStuber K, Lerede C, Kristmanson K, Sajko S, Bruno P. The diagnostic accuracy of the Kemp's test: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2014;58(3):258-267.
- RelatedStuber K, Lerede C, Kristmanson K, Sajko S, Bruno P. The diagnostic accuracy of the Kemp's test: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2014;58(3):258-67.
Prone Hip Extension Test (Prone Hip Extension or Femoral Nerve Stretch)
Procedure
Patient prone. Bend the knee to about 90° and then lift the thigh into hip extension while stabilising the pelvis with your other hand. Note what the patient feels and where. This combines a hip flexor stretch with the femoral nerve stretch position.
Positive Finding
Either a stretch felt at the front of the hip or thigh (hip flexor tightness), or the patient's familiar anterior thigh pain (possible upper lumbar nerve-root involvement), or low back pain as the lumbar spine is drawn into extension.
Interpretation
Record which of the three responses occurred, because they mean different things. Familiar anterior thigh pain should lead to a neurological examination of L2–L4. Back pain alone is consistent with non-specific low back pain and simply shows that extension is provocative.
Active Trunk Rotation (Sitting or Standing)
Procedure
Patient seated with feet on the floor to lock the pelvis (or standing). Ask the patient to turn the trunk to each side as far as comfortable, arms folded across the chest. Compare the two sides and note any pain.
Positive Finding
Less rotation to one side, pain at end of range, or guarded, hesitant movement.
Interpretation
A range-of-motion and pain-behaviour check, not a diagnostic test. Most trunk rotation happens in the thoracic spine, so a sitting test mainly reflects thoracic movement. Use it as a baseline and to monitor response to treatment.
⚠ Red Flags
- •Cauda equina syndrome (bilateral leg pain, progressive neurological deficit, bowel/bladder dysfunction, saddle anesthesia)
- •Severe unrelenting pain unresponsive to conservative care with systemic symptoms (fever, weight loss, night sweats)
- •Traumatic onset with severe mechanism of injury (high-energy fall, motor vehicle accident)
- •Progressive neurological deficit with dermatomal or myotomal pattern
- •Suspected infection (fever, elevated inflammatory markers, immunocompromise history)
- •Suspected malignancy (history of cancer, unexplained weight loss, night sweats, progressive symptoms)
- •Fracture suspicion (age >70, corticosteroid use, osteoporosis, severe trauma)
⚡ Yellow Flags
- •High pain catastrophizing or fear-avoidance beliefs
- •Depressed mood, anxiety, or recent significant life stress
- •Belief that pain indicates serious underlying damage or disease
- •Prolonged work absence or workers' compensation dispute
- •Excessive health-seeking behavior or medication overuse
- •Limited social support or social isolation
- •History of childhood trauma or adverse life experiences
- •Belief that activity will worsen condition (kinesiophobia)
- •Secondary gain (financial benefits, attention from family/healthcare)
- •Inconsistent behavioral patterns between reported and observed function
Osteopathic Techniques
Manual therapy gives short-term relief in chronic low back pain. Osteopathic treatment beats no treatment, but a 2024 review found it no better than sham. Keep the patient active.
- Journal articleFranke et al. · BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014
- Journal articleCeballos-Laita et al. · Diseases 2024
- Journal articleConde-Vázquez et al. · Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2026
- Reference bookMargetis et al. · StatPearls 2025
Safety: Rule out serious causes first. Cauda equina symptoms, suspected fracture, infection or cancer need medical assessment before any manual technique.
- Reference bookMargetis et al. · StatPearls 2025
- Reference bookLafans & Troncoso · StatPearls 2024
Region
Lumbar spine (restricted segments)
Technique
Rationale
Gentle, graded movement of stiff lumbar segments. Use it to ease pain enough for the patient to stay active.
How it's done, cautions & evidence
How it's done
Rhythmic, low-velocity movement of restricted lumbar segments within their passive range, with no thrust, usually side-lying or prone. The amplitude can vary.
Cautions
Side effects reported in trials were mild and short-lived: soreness, tiredness or a flare of existing symptoms.
Evidence in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
A 2018 review found moderate-quality evidence that mobilisation reduces pain compared with other active therapies (small effect), but not disability. A 2026 umbrella review found manual therapy beats other treatments in the short term, with the benefit fading over time.
Sources
- Journal articleCoulter et al. · Spine J 2018
- Journal articleConde-Vázquez et al. · Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2026
Region
Lumbar paraspinals, quadratus lumborum and gluteals
Technique
Rationale
Eases guarding and muscle tone in the low back and hips. Short-term relief, best paired with movement and exercise.
How it's done, cautions & evidence
How it's done
Hands-on soft-tissue work (kneading, stretching and sustained pressure) to the lumbar paraspinals, quadratus lumborum and gluteal muscles, usually prone or side-lying.
Cautions
Only minor side effects have been reported in trials.
Evidence in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
A Cochrane review found massage better than inactive controls for short-term pain and function in subacute and chronic low back pain. Evidence quality was low to very low.
Sources
- Journal articleFurlan et al. · Cochrane 2015
Region
Lumbar spine (restricted segments)
Technique
Rationale
Low-force and patient-powered, so it suits a sore back. Used to restore segmental motion.
How it's done, cautions & evidence
How it's done
Usually seated (or side-lying). The lumbar segment is taken to its restricted barrier in side-bending and rotation. The patient gently pushes toward the free direction for 3–5 seconds against equal resistance, relaxes, and the new barrier is taken up. Repeat 3–5 times, then re-check.
Cautions
Do not use after recent lumbar surgery, or with spinal fracture, acute cord compression, cauda equina syndrome, cancer in the spine, spinal infection (osteomyelitis) or severe osteoporosis. Use gentler options in frail patients and in anyone who cannot follow instructions.
Evidence in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
A 2022 review found a small effect on pain in chronic low back pain and a moderate one in subacute, with no benefit for disability. A 2015 Cochrane review found low-quality evidence that MET adds no benefit for chronic pain or disability; the trials were small with high risk of bias.
Sources
- Reference bookLafans & Troncoso · StatPearls 2024
- Journal articleSantos et al. · Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2022
- Journal articleFranke et al. · Cochrane 2015
Region
Lumbar tender points (anterior and posterior)
Technique
Rationale
Very gentle, indirect option for an acutely painful back. Best used as an add-on to exercise, not on its own.
How it's done, cautions & evidence
How it's done
Find an anterior or posterior lumbar tender point, then passively position the patient (usually using the hips and legs) until its tenderness drops by at least 70%. Hold for 90 seconds, return slowly to neutral, and re-check the point.
Cautions
Do not use over an acute fracture. Take care if the position could aggravate a vascular or nerve problem, with severe spondylosis and fused levels, severe hip osteoporosis, a previous hip dislocation, or a patient who cannot give feedback.
Evidence in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
A 2025 review found positional release (including counterstrain) added to physiotherapy beat physiotherapy alone, with very low certainty. It was not supported as a stand-alone treatment, and MET did better than positional release.
Sources
- Reference bookGoldenhart & Skidmore · StatPearls 2023
- Journal articleDanazumi et al. · J Bodyw Mov Ther 2025
Rehabilitation Exercises
Lumbar flexion-extension movements (standing or seated)
Piriformis stretch (figure-4 or lying cross-leg)
Hip flexor stretch (low lunge or Thomas position awareness)
Transverse abdominis activation (lying supine with abdominal drawing-in)
Bridging with glute activation (supine hip extension)
Quadruped rocking or bird dogs (alternating limb extension)
Dead bug exercise (alternating limb extension in supine)
Side-lying clamshells with hip abduction
Standing lumbar stabilization against wall with pelvic tilt awareness
Single-leg stance or tandem walking for proprioceptive awareness
Planks or modified planks with trunk co-contraction
Walking, swimming, or cycling for aerobic conditioning and activity tolerance
Referral Criteria
- •Presence of red flag features (cauda equina syndrome, infection, malignancy, fracture, progressive neurological deficit)
- •Persistent symptoms unresponsive to conservative care after 6-8 weeks
- •Significant psychosocial barriers to recovery (depression, anxiety, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia) requiring mental health intervention
- •Neurological examination findings consistent with nerve root compression or myelopathy requiring imaging and specialist assessment
- •Suspected sacroiliac joint dysfunction or other specific mechanical pathology requiring advanced imaging
- •Work-related or complex chronic pain presentation requiring interdisciplinary pain management approach
- •Need for epidural corticosteroid injection or surgical consultation after conservative management failure
- •Significant functional impairment or disability affecting occupational or social capacity
Evidence Grade Key